This was a gift, and I was initially pleased with the display and seemingly easy controls. The first few pictures I took outdoors were OK, and the panoramic mode was a novelty. However, when I tried to take pictures indoors, I noticed the display was grainy – and the pictures were HORRIBLE. I thought it was user-error, and tried every combination of settings. At any MP setting, the pictures are grainy with incorrect color. Kodak was running a promo at Best Buy, and this model was “highly recommended.” It is an inferior piece of junk at any price, and I wish I could return it. The USB connector is non-standard on the camera end. Picture transfer is SLOOOW, and often the device is not recognized by the PC. I have totally lost confidence in this brand.
Just like the others of the kind, Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera is also on its way to please consumers who love to shoot at sight. It strives to be one of the finest. However, it does not achieve this end. Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera is an ordinary digital camera that is suitable for beginners. It is a simple device with the minimum number of features. Since it is a low budget camera, it is worth purchasing for those who hold a low budget.
Design
Well designed keeping the needs of today's consumers. It weighs only 143 grams.
Key Features
Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera has a 6.1 megapixels CCD sensor. It has a 2.4" LCD display which delivers crisp and clear images. Apart from this, it has a 5x continuous digital zoom with LCD preview. It is also enabled with a 3x optical zoom. Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera is integrated with a 6.1 megapixels CCD and a 3x optical zoom. It covers an area of 36mm to 108 mm. It has a 2.4" LCD that leaves enough space for a small Kodak EASYSHARE M883 8MP Camera optical viewfinder.
It comes with several shooting modes and a special macro mode. It has an in built memory which can be upgraded as per your wish. Transferring data with the help of Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera is also easy. You just need to use it various features like Direct print, PictBridge or attach it to a personal computer through a USB device. It is compatible with operating systems like Microsoft Windows and Mac Operating System.
User Friendly Aspects
Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera's automatic shooting mode is one of the welcome features that this camera has. Besides this, it offers twenty distinct scene presets for various situations. As a result, shooting on special occasions with Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera becomes an easy task. You could also manually adjust the white balance of the images.
Performance
Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera can shoot only 10 frames per second. The video quality is also not up to the mark. Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera takes a start up time of three seconds that positions it way behind its competitors. Photos delivered by Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera are not up to the mark. They may look good on emails, Webpages or in a 4x6 prints. If you enlarge them beyond this, all its flaws may become discernable. Even though this camera is not up to the mark for professional outings, it delivers for normal social events.
Conclusion
Kodak Easyshare C653 Zoom Digital Camera is a simple camera with pretty good features for beginners. They may be attracted to use it since it comes with a low price tag. For advanced photographers, there are others in the market
To know more visit : http://www.naaptol.com/buy-online/WO-best-shopping-deals-W68O/cameras/digital_cameras/kodak_easyshare_c653_zoom_digital_camera.html
Help answer the question about Kodak EASYSHARE M883 8MP Camera
kodak m883 digital camera?
i just got it and i'm really disappointed with it. i don't know much about cameras and photography, but the photos seem grainy and the resolution Kodak EASYSHARE M883 8MP Camera seems low. i had a canon power shot model that was 10 x zoom and 3.2 megapixels and i loved it. what are your thoughts on the kodak m883?i'd really like a new canon, but my parents bought the easyshare printer also so i can print photos. if i can exchange for a new kodak camera, which would you recommend? thanks in advance.
Watch the video related to Kodak EASYSHARE M883 8MP Camera
 | USB U-8 Cable For Kodak EasyShare M340 C180 M380 C1013 USD $0.01 Order Now |
Google Videos - Kodak EASYSHARE M883 8MP Camera
Search results for query: [Kodak EASYSHARE M883 8MP Camera]
Z1012 Video Review PART1
The Kodak Easy Share Z1012 IS Digital Camera is a High Performance camera that you can pick up at a reasonable price. Its capable of producing 10 ...
Kodak EASYSHARE C875 8MP Camera Free Important Tip
Sony Mavica MVC FD91 Digital Camera Roadmap
Nikon Coolpix 4600 4MP Camera information, prices, and auctions!
How come you should buy Sony Cybershot DSC-W170/R Camera
Sony Mavica MVC FD75 Digital Camera Useful Article
Kodak EASYSHARE Z1285 12MP Camera Free Interrelated Hint
Olympus FE-310 Camera Free Interesting Hint
Nikon Coolpix P80 10MP Camera auctions
Nikon Coolpix S700 12.1MP Camera Assistive Hint
Blog For Canon PowerShot SD400 Digital 5MP Camera
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
I bought this camera on a two day road trip. I had forgotten my cam at home and, for $119 at K-Mart, I hadn’t much to lose. I have had Olympus, Canon, Sony in the past and decided to try the Kodak. The camera held up well, was easy to figure out, and had decent battery life…but, despite what seems a nice collection of features, the photos have consistently turned out grainier than my other cam (6MP). Low light photos were not worth saving despite using several “evening” presets. Comparing the over dozen shooting modes, I found little if any difference in photos.
When shooting mountain views, portraits and a video of a street performer, my friend’s 6MP canon powershot consistently turned out much better photos. This was based on same view, with me shooting half the photos on their cam, and they shooting half on mine over a three day period. Suffice it to say, plain daytime photos at fairly close range will be adequate, but forget enlarging or any lowlight. Video isn’t much better. It says 8 Megapixels but I’d swear it’s half that. Cough up another $40 or $50 and you wont kick yourself later. Cheers
My M883 just died on me. Took a picture during lunch, drove home, and now when I turn it on, the lens pops out, screams at me twice, then shuts off. I bought the camera in September of 2007, and have treated it as new ever since. I found out I could pay about 100 bucks to have it repaired, or…well, anything but that sounds better.
It’s an ok camera. To be honest the main reason I bought it was its size, and experience with Kodak cameras in the past. Pictures were usually a crapshoot–sometimes they looked grainy, sometimes they looked perfect. My biggest gripe would be the blur…no amount of fiddling with the settings would help make some of the blur diminish. I feel I have steady hands, and even when I tried my hardest to keep a steady shot, I would get the blur detector. I imagine if the camera were on a tripod, there would be some blur if the wind was blowing.
Like I said, I bought this camera in ‘07. It served me well, but if two and a half years is its average lifespan, I don’t think it’s worth the price. Especially if you throw in the sometimes great/sometimes just ok pictures. It was a very easy camera to use, which was nice, and I’m in no way a photo snob, so the picture quality didn’t totally bug me (all the time). I’ll miss my dead M883 camera, but probably not that much.
This camera is cute and small, so it is easy to take with you, and it is easy to use, and it has a nice big display screen (3 inches). That being said, it takes horrible pictures, which is much more important. Low light is very grainy, as others have said, and what I really hate is that wide-angle shots really distort at the edges giving a fishbowl appearance. Do NOT waste your money on this camera!
I bought this camera last spring before my wedding. I’m not a serious photographer and just wanted something simple. I’d had EZ shares before and figured I’d upgrade to the lastest model before our honeymoon. Like others have mentioned, the picture quality on this camera is nothing short of atrocious — slightly better than a cell phone. I figured it was just me until I stumbled across these reviews. I’m very disappointed in the Kodak brand for selling this junk and recently purchased an excellent Canon for my next vacation.
This was a gift, and I was initially pleased with the display and seemingly easy controls. The first few pictures I took outdoors were OK, and the panoramic mode was a novelty. However, when I tried to take pictures indoors, I noticed the display was grainy – and the pictures were HORRIBLE. I thought it was user-error, and tried every combination of settings. At any MP setting, the pictures are grainy with incorrect color. Kodak was running a promo at Best Buy, and this model was “highly recommended.” It is an inferior piece of junk at any price, and I wish I could return it. The USB connector is non-standard on the camera end. Picture transfer is SLOOOW, and often the device is not recognized by the PC. I have totally lost confidence in this brand.
You must log in to post a comment.